The result of their analysis was a hypothesis that is an exemplary “association study”. They estimated that in 20 years, the traditional Inuit diet would have changed to the western diet, and Dyerberg remembers Bang saying: “‘There will never be anyone who can do this again, so let’s do whatever we can!’ And we decided to do fatty acid analysis.” “We had these 130 precious samples of blood,” Dyerberg told me in his lab in Copenhagen recently.
They probed and palpated 130 local people, measured height and weight, and came home with a lot of blood. At the time of the expedition, Bang didn’t quite know what he wanted to test for. He and his assistant, Jørn Dyerberg, travelled to Uummannaq on the north-west coast of Greenland to investigate. In the early 1970s, the chemist Hans Olaf Bang read in a Danish journal that there were extremely low incidences of cardiovascular disease in Inuit communities of Greenland. By the time omega-3s started to be a focus of medical research, there was already a rosy feeling around fish oil.
Möller built his company into an international presence and died in 1869 with 70 cod-liver oil steam factories to his name, churning out 5,000 barrels of the stuff a year. The campaign was a success: a spoonful a day became common practice.
Möller and his advertising team then launched a campaign to institutionalise the regular use of cod-liver oil, regardless of whether you were at risk of rickets or not. Using a patented chemical process, he arrived at a product that, he announced to the world, “didn’t taste fishy”. And, as it turned out, vitamin D is stored in high amounts within the liver of codfish.Ī Norwegian pharmacist named Peter Möller seized upon this finding (and many other anecdotal stories about the curative properties of cod-liver oil). Researchers eventually pieced the puzzle together and concluded that the disease was caused by a deficiency in vitamin D, which the body naturally generates in the presence of sunlight. Malnourished children in sunlight-poor urban slums often ended up bowlegged by adolescence. During the Industrial Revolution, a disease became increasingly prevalent throughout northern Europe: rickets. But it had nothing to do with coronary heart disease. Once upon a time, fish oil solved a major human health problem. The confusion arises in part from the historical baggage of fish oil and the $30bn (£23bn) industry associated with omega-3 extraction. But without the larger context of the marine organisms that contain them, omega-3s get lost in the noise of human metabolism and modern marketing. Omega-3s do something in our bodies – and probably something important. But what does surprise me is how we continue to look at the world of fish and seafood through the amber lens of a fish oil capsule. Over the past 15 years, more than 20 studies have shown a similar lack of effect. I can’t say that I was particularly surprised. After comparing 79 trials involving 112,059 people, the researchers could find “little or no difference to risk of cardiovascular events, coronary heart deaths, coronary heart disease events, stroke or heart irregularities”.
Last week, Cochrane, an organisation that compiles and evaluates medical research for the general public, released a meta-analysis – a study of studies – to determine whether or not omega-3 pills, one of the world’s most popular dietary supplements, reduced the risk of coronary heart disease. (b) When some circumstance or problem is present which influences the person's health status but is not in itself a current illness or injury.T he omega-3 industry is in a twist.(a) When a person who may or may not be sick encounters the health services for some specific purpose, such as to receive limited care or service for a current condition, to donate an organ or tissue, to receive prophylactic vaccination (immunization), or to discuss a problem which is in itself not a disease or injury.Categories Z00-Z99 are provided for occasions when circumstances other than a disease, injury or external cause classifiable to categories A00-Y89 are recorded as 'diagnoses' or 'problems'.
A corresponding procedure code must accompany a Z code if a procedure is performed.